ESize Mattersvery time I buy a new smartphone, I expect to get more capability with faster speed, yet I still expect all of this at the same price or lower. Why do I expect this to be possible? As transistors get smaller, cheaper and faster, this should translate to better technology each time you buy a new device. I guess that is why no one wants to keep a phone until it dies anymore, and why we are used to getting more for less each time we purchase a new phone. 

The relationship between transistor size and value has been somewhat constant over the past decades and is commonly known as Moore’s law. While we may not be totally aware of how this law works, we have come to expect the benefits that it has delivered. Roughly stated, approximately every two years the density of computer transistors on computer chips doubles. This means that computer chips take up less space and do more work at faster speeds and at a lower cost for everything that uses them.

Indicators of transistor size have been used to describe the advancement in chip manufacturing capability. Most recently these processes have been called 20 or 22 nanometers (nm), with these numbers describing the size of chip features – wires or transistors – which can be easily measured. This provides a measure of speed, cost and performance. 

That is all changing according to Chenming Hu, the co-inventor of the FinFET state-of-the-art transistor. “Nobody knows anymore what 16 nm means or what 14 nm means,” said Hu, when describing the latest FinFET chips slated to begin shipping in 2014.

In a recent article Rachel Courtland* points out that chip makers are expressing the relative merit of new technologies with “Node Numbers.”Design and process improvements drive each improvement in performance while delivering better cost performance with no relation to the size of the transistors or features used to make up the complex computer chips. The relationship between the size of transistors and improvements in density and performance is now related to other process improvements. Since 2007 the size of transistor gates remained somewhat static and in 2013 the pitch of wires on chips seems to have stalled. So chip manufacturers now use these Node Numbers to indicate a new generation of technology. 

Keeping track of Moore’s law will be more difficult in the future without the obvious points of reference we used in the past such as transistor size. Perhaps new metrics will become apparent. For example, effective chip density may be a new metric to measure future node improvements. The IT industry is somewhat driven by the technology progression predicted by Moore’s law, and it is an important consideration in IT investment strategies. 

Data center network infrastructures are another example of this discussion. New technologies like software-defined networks are creating new capabilities by enhancing traditional internet protocol data networks. Traditional data center IP networks must now focus on other metrics – density, scalability, reliability and agility – to support evolving data center network applications. The old metrics used to measure network capability, such as 10G and 40G Ethernet, still exist as a baseline, but new metrics are needed to describe new data center innovations. SDN and other new data center architectures will drive better network efficiency. As always, the founding physical layer must evolve to support these innovations. 

Whether you are buying a new smartphone or building a new data center, we all expect to see better results for less money as time goes by. Innovation will continue to provide cost improvement and help sustain the Moore effect for IT systems. Investing in the right partnerships that foster innovation will serve you well as more focus is placed on optimizing traditional technologies. Some of the traditional drivers, like transistor size, might not provide the same pace of innovation they have in the past. I believe Moore’s law will continue to hold true. I am already planning my next system purchase based on what I expect the cost and performance to be in two years. 

How are you planning your future systems purchase?

 *IEEE Spectrum, Nov 2013, pg. 24 - 27

About the Author

James Young

James currently serves as the Director of CommScope’s Enterprise Data Center division, overseeing strategy and providing leadership to product and field teams globally. Formerly James has been involved in a variety of roles including sales, marketing and operations for communication solutions working with Tyco Electronics/AMP, Anixter, Canadian Pacific and TTS in Canada. 

James has gained extensive experience in the sale of OEM products, network solutions and value-added services through direct and indirect channel sales environments. His sales experience includes electronic transmission components, telephony systems, network systems, LAN infrastructure products and fibre transmission system products. James has garnered substantial experience in OEM and channel marketing, as well as network operations as assistant director of CP’s computers and communications group. 

James graduated with a Bachelor of Science from the University of Western Ontario.  He is a registered Communication Distribution Designer (RCDD) and certified Data Center Design Professional (CDCP).

See all posts by this author

Add Your Comment

Please submit your comment using the form below

 
(required)