CommScope's COVID-19 Customer & Partner Hub Visit
For too long, the importance of microwave backhaul antennas has been overlooked and costs have been the main consideration when deciding which antennas to use. The low quality antennas that come at lower costs not only degrade the performance of the network but waste spectrum.
To ensure efficient utilization of spectrum, it is important to use antennas with low sidelobes, which are the most important characteristic for the efficient usage of spectrum. Such antennas are more efficient since they allow more links to be made with the minimum number of channels in any region. Since they allow for improved utilization of higher modulation schemes, the availability of higher capacity can also be increased significantly.
The demand for efficient utilization of spectrum increases if a larger channel size is used to increase capacity. As a result, low sidelobe antennas improve the customer experience and that improves the revenue potential for the carriers.
The Answer Lies in Class 4
For efficient spectrum management, it becomes extremely important to explore new microwave antenna technologies when demand is expected to exceed supply.
As per ETSI (European Telecommunications Standards Institute) standards, microwave antennas are graded in four classes (class 1, 2, 3 & 4) based on their radiation patterns. ETSI Class 1 is the most relaxed antenna class, whereas ETSI Class 4 has extremely low sidelobes for efficient spectrum management. The number of radio links has grown with the passage of time. Consequently, there has been growth in the likelihood of interference in urban and suburban settings.
As a result, the ETSI Class 1 standard (worldwide) is no longer used from 3 to 86 GHz, and in environments with potential interference or congestion, the choice of antenna by carriers has changed from ETSI Class 2 to mainly but not exclusively Class 3. This trend is evolving further and the market is now looking for ETSI Class 4 solutions. In 2013, a study was conducted to investigate the difference of Class 4 antennas compared to Class 3. Class 4 antennas were found to provide a significant reduction in interference.
As urban electrical congestion grows, the Class 4 antennas represent a new opportunity in spectrum conservation. They are also economically viable, given recently realized low-cost production techniques.
The size of the antenna is decided based on the required receive signal level (RSL). In dense environments where high capacity is in demand to satisfy user needs, the carrier to interference (C/I) ratio is another parameter that dictates the size of the antenna. In some cases, larger sized antennas are used not because of RSL but to improve C/I. The larger antennas solve the problem in this regard but also increase CapEx and OpEx costs. Using low side lobe Class 4 antennas allows operators to use relatively smaller size antennas even in dense and high capacity demand areas. The potential to use smaller microwave antennas does not only reduce total cost of ownership (TCO) but allows site sharing strategy implementation more efficiently.
Planning Backhaul for both Today and Tomorrow
Given the data capacity demands and the end-users’ high expectations on network quality, carriers need to pay attention to spectrum usage to future-ready their network. With the superior performance of Class 4 antennas, carriers have the opportunity to make this happen in an economically viable way.
This blog post originally appeared in the TeleTalk blog on ETTelecom.com.